This article on the importance of bringing a topic focus to the news is very important. The thesis is that the article-by-article nature of modern news is incapable of covering issues on any but the most trivial of levels, since every (short) article needs to start from scratch.
If you've felt like the news media can't ever seem to get past the first couple of days of Econ 101 (or other equivalent topics), this is why. They are structurally incapable of it.
My BlogBooks are also an attempt to address this. Weblogs have the advantage of being able to use links, but it is still hard to build up coverage, and still easy to say the same things over and over again. Since I really hate to do that, my posting frequency has tended to drop off. (One only has so many truly new blog entries in them.)
(Oh, and while I chose not to talk about it here since it's not really the focus of this site, the recent birth of my son leaves less useful time for such things. But that's only a recent change, I've had low posting frequency for a while.)
The BlogBooks are acceptable for me (and I hope to get back to them someday, I have a lot of stuff written but it needs the final editing pass), but in general they won't work for media organizations. They need something more like a hybrid Wiki approach. I've seen people try to implement hybrid Wiki/Blogs, built because of this need, but I'm yet to see one that I feel was used to actually build up coverage in the manner we're looking for. You need more than just making the Wiki technology available; somehow we've got to make it easy to build up progressions of posts into a coherent whole, and there are some fundamental contradictions between a post/article and the sort of coherent whole we're looking for.
Under the hood, I've actually done some work with my BlogBooks that make it possible for a book entry to have its own header and footer, so that the weblog manifestation of the entry can actually be slightly different than the BlogBook manifestation, but that is definitely not adequate.
Now that I type this up, I've actually got some ideas based on some of the Iron Lute work I've been doing recently, but they aren't well-formed enough to post here. I was going to segue from the preceding paragraph into a claim that it may not really be possible, but maybe it is. But not with the current way we deal with text; without a richer conception of text, the fundamental incompatibility between an "article" and "topic" are going to be hard to overcome.
More bailout stuff, skip if that makes you unhappy.
How did we get here? The economy is fantastically complicated beyond human comprehension, so we are forced to use heuristics to comprehend it. No amount of education can overcome this fact, which is why every economy professor is proposing a different solution; the education doesn't mean you actually understand, it "just" changes the heuristics.
A bailout that does not remove the mandates that banks issue bad loans is worse than no bailout at all. It just guarantees that when this happens again, next time it'll be even bigger.
How about repealing the Community Reinvestment Act, at the very least pending an investigation?
How about instead of banning corporate parachutes, we ban subprime mortgages entirely? How about phasing in requirements for a 10% down payment, minimum? (And make these clauses airtight; I don't care how ethnic you are, pony up the dough or GTFO.) Both of these are actually fairly bad ideas for various reasons, but I think both would be better than this bill's policy of transfusing blood into a bleeding patient and declaring victory!
Michelle Malkin has the story behind the Palin email hack. (Warning: Link to Michelle Malkin, if you're sensitive about that. But the email quoted by that post is as close to primary source as I can get.)
In summary, Palin's email account was hacked by exploiting the fact that Palin's answers to the security questions that allow a user to reset their password could be even-more-easily-than-usually guessed by accessing public information, which then permitted full access to her account.
I wanted to discuss this situation from a computer security point of view, because there's a lot of interesting stuff going on in this example.
Swoopo, which I refuse to link to, is one amazingly evil site. It is an auction site (for some loose definition of the word "auction") that works as follows:
- A mark registers for the site and buys "bids" for $1 each.
- The site puts an item up for auction, starting the price at 15 cents.
|<- Future Posts||Past Posts ->|