Sep 11, 2000

Copyright and Copying Wrongs: A Web Re-balancing Act
Music & MP3
9/11/2000; 4:53:35 PM 'There is a large legal irony here. may be thoroughly punished (the company is appealing the ruling), even though it has tried to ensure that people pay for copies of the music they want to listen to, said Pamela Samuelson, co-director of the University of California's Berkeley Center for Law and Technology. By contrast, Napster, another high-profile Internet music company being sued by the major record labels, has so far eluded any legal sanction for its activities, even though it exists to give people free access to the same music.'

What a crazy world.

Sep 08, 2000

Poland Ready to Clear Electronic Signatures
General IP Issues9/8/2000; 7:09:57 PM 'Polish financial institutions joined forces to enable local Internet
users to use electronic signatures in e-commerce and e-banking after the appropriate
law is approved later this year, the central bank said on Thursday.'
Regretfully, the article does not make clear if these are electronic or digital signitures. Explanation from the Glossary.

Sep 08, 2000

C-SPAN 2 RIght Now
Personal Notes
9/8/2000; 6:58:16 PM C-SPAN 2 right now is discussing "Privacy Act & the Presidency" right now, at 8:05 p.m. EST.

Don't know if it's necessarily all that interesting overall, but technically Carnivore belongs to the President, so some issues I cover on this site might be covered.

Sep 08, 2000

RealNetworks, Streambox Settle Copyright Case
General IP Issues
9/8/2000; 2:48:14 PM 'Streaming-media software company RealNetworks (RNWK) ended one of the first tests of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act on Friday with an out-of court settlement with Streambox, a software rival it had accused of copyright infringement.

'RealNetworks' federal suit, filed Dec. 22 in Federal District Court for the Western District of Washington, accused Streambox of violating the DMCA with its Streambox Ripper and Streambox VCR products. The Ripper converts RealAudio files, which can be copy-protected by their owners, into MP3, WAV or Windows Media files, which lack similar copy protection. Streambox VCR can play and record video streams in the RealPlayer G2 format, also sidestepping copy protection.'

Sep 08, 2000

Metallica's Lawyer Asks 11 Major Institutions to Ban Napster
Music & MP39/8/2000; 2:32:07 PM 'The lawyer for the rock band Metallica and the rap artist Dr. Dre has sent letters to 11 prominent universities asking the institutions to restrict students' access to Napster, the popular MP3 file-sharing service. Letters went out Wednesday night to Columbia, Harvard, and Stanford Universities, and the University of Virginia. The lawyer, Howard E. King, said he was sending letters Thursday to Boston University, the Georgia Institute of Technology, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, the University of California at Berkeley, and the University of California at Los Angeles.' ...'The courts have yet to make clear whether a university can be successfully sued for not preventing specific online behaviors by students for whom the university provides network access. Some observers say no one would think of suing a telephone company because its customers use Napster in ways that violate copyright law. 'At the same time, however, university administrators do not appear eager to devote time and money to fighting legal battles that are largely unrelated to their educational missions -- especially not battles that would put them in the awkward position of defending students who were violating musicians' intellectual-property rights.'I think this likely, they admins from at least one of these universities will fold now, in order to "save themselves the hassle".It's not just cowardly (although courage doesn't pay the lawyers, unfortunately), it's false economy.It is most assuredly not worth fighting for the university network user's "rights" to use Napster, from the University's point of view. It is worth the fight to not be considered responsible for the use of the network by those students. You may save money not fighting today, but you will face more of these requests over the next few years, quite probably enough to make up for the money you would have spent defending yourselves, if these universities would just ban together and fight the responsibility. This is a major trap for these universities.As the Universities themselves would remind you under other circumstances, they are not policemen or parents. Their mission is education, not stopping the students from doing illegal things on the network, which can't be done anyhow.

<- Future Posts Past Posts ->


Site Links


All Posts